Like many things in the glare of the
media, teachers are either saints or whores. Almost all of the teacher movies I
know have the teacher-as-martyr as the central theme. The hard working, creative teacher connects to the kids,
achieves success few believed possible, and then burns out in an Icarus with a
half twist. The other set of
movies follows the "Ferris Bueller...Bueller....Bueller" Theme where
the teacher is an incompetent bungler.
When we have this conversation, I want to pull away from the media
reflections and go back to our own reflections.
I found last year's discussion of
homework fascinating and career transforming for me. On this list, many of the same folks battled about the
amount of homework to take home, until one voice shouted out that she brought
home no homework. In the ensuing
hullabaloo, the "no homework for me" voices pointed out that all of
the grading takes away from family, wedded, and personal lives. T.S. Eliot commented that our world
would be known by thousands of lost golf balls. More famously, Prufrock measured his life in coffee spoons. I was measuring mine in rubrics and red
pens.
I have been a teacher for 16
years. In my early years, it was a
100 hour a week job. Photocopying,
prepping, advising, grading, and doing the committee work over and over, year
after year, summer after summer.
As a result, I am a really, really good teacher. I can bring the lowest up and the highest higher. Every other aspect of my life
withered. When my wife and I went
to Boston for two troubled births, I taught my classes by videoconference,
e-mail, and the web. I put the
students on a video for the week of the actual birth. I returned to the classroom two weeks later. Such choices looked noble then, selfish
now.
These days, I have been resisting
the "nobility of sacrifice" in becoming a teacher and the Nick Nolte
"Teachers" low comedy, and trying to make it a job. Now, it is a job that I love and
enjoy. I identify myself with this
job. But it is not my identity and
it fits in my life in "fourth place." If you ever turned on the TV so the kids would be quiet
while you finished grading a set of essays, you should know precisely what I mean.
All that said, I want to pick a
fight over Elitisim. When I taught
at St. Mark's of Texas, the gentleman who did the book buying had a MLK poster
up in his workspace that said something like "If a man is called to be a streetsweeper
, he should sweep streets even as Michelangelo painted, or
Beethoven composed music or Shakespeare wrote poetry. He should sweep streets
so well that the hosts of heaven and earth will pause to say, here lived a
great streetsweeper who did his job well. " I admire that sign and sentiment very
much. (Note that even MLK uses the
word "job")
God, however, does not let you know
what your calling is. That same
quote works if you replace streetsweeper with concert violinist or
mathematician. Most of my male
students believe they are called to play professional football, or, failing
that Madden 2004 for money. Many
of the parents are very happy to have their kids skip college in order to sell
plumbing supplies. And most of the
friends and classmates can't think past Saturday night.
So, in that atmosphere, I believe in
raising the bar as high as I can.
Grades are merely metaphors...they are shorthand for skills and
knowledge. If a parent only values
a grade, I will value it as well, and then stuff as many worthwhile skills into
that grades as I can get. In our
lives and especially in high school, we don't know what God calls us to
do. Therefore, it is only prudent
that we look under the hood and see what equipment the Big Guy left for
us.
Parents, Kids, and Peers don't want
to look under the hood. They don't
want to be special or have an ability that makes them different. God, No. Teachers have to do that and they often have to go against
the wishes of everyone else to find it.
How many students have you failed that became great? Many. How many of the kids who hated you and keyed your car in the
spring, come forward sheepishly four years later with a thank you? Many.
If you teach difficult work
skillfully, but a student has not been given the English machinery under the
hood, the worst you have taught are those skills (Reading, Writing, Thinking,
Speaking) and some personal fortitude.
Disappointment is the underwear for all adults. We all wear some.
I also do not honor hypocrisy. I think placing undue importance on the
grades is ridiculous. All grades
are metaphors. They dry up and
blow away in a few years. Those
spoiled suburban kids wearing the golden rings should learn to fight hard. The American promise of AP is that a 5
earned at Martin Luther King High is the same as a 5 from St. Paul's. A 5 is a 5, whether in the barrio or B
Street.
So, no more guilt for me. Escalante, Mr. Holland, and the rest of
them can continue to burn out in Brueghel's sea. I am the guy at the plow.
(And, just a little Catcher for
you: "A foolish man will die
nobly for a cause, a wise man will live humbly for one.")
B
On Sunday, August 17, 2003, at 07:15
PM, Susan van Druten wrote:
Wow, only one teacher out there
responds to the charge! This is
kind of amazing. Are we so beaten
down with the miracles the world expects of us that we take the whipping
without a sound? Phyllis is
right: the system wants our blood
or our guilt. Escalante gave his
blood and the rest of us give our guilt [Who else is giving blood so that
Escalante's burden is being repeated?].
At your school? Not at
mine. Not even close.
Here's another take: Elitism is the belief that you are no
good unless you are an academic success.
If you pitch in and help out at your family restaurant when you could be
taking an AP calculus test, you are a disappointment to the American dream and
America (and no-child-left-behind) rejects you. Who is a teacher to make these decisions for a student and
her family?
There is nobility in hard work
wherever one finds it: studying for a test or peeling potatoes. I honor that. What I do not honor is hypocrisy: signing up for AP or
honors and then complaining and rationalizing your way to success. Escalante might have had to beg
inner-city kids to grab the golden ring, but in most of America we have to
force suburban kids to realize that the golden ring they are wearing might not
fit.
Susan
On Saturday, August 16, 2003, at
01:27 PM, Phyllis Fleischaker wrote:
Jaime Escalante destroyed his
marriage and his health,
if I remember correctly. Is that
what the "system"
wants of us?
Phyllis Fleischaker
Blair HS, Silver Spring, MD
Re: anti-AP expansion article
From: "Susan van Druten"
<bosvd@cpinternet.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 21:38:14
-0500
Plain Text Attachment [ Save to my
Yahoo! Briefcase |
Download File ]
I exchanged a few emails with Jay
Mathews (the author
of the article
that started this thread, "AP
Courses Not for
Everyone, Educator
Says").
He wants to know why Jamie
Escalante's kids (75
percent of whom were
from homes that qualified for free
and reduced
lunch, their parents ALL grade
school dropouts, and
most having so-so
grades) can manage to all get 3's
or higher on the AP
calculus test and
the rest of us seem to have so
much trouble with this
goal.
Well, what is wrong with the rest
of us? How come we
aren't the best
teachers in America?
Susan