Murder Most Musical

 

By A. O. SCOTT

Published: December 21, 2007

 

Tim Burton makes fantasy movies. Stephen Sondheim writes musicals. It is hard to think of two more optimistic genres of popular art, or of two popular artists who have so systematically subverted that optimism. Mr. Sondheim has always gravitated toward the dissonance lurking in hummable tunes, and has threaded his song-and-dance spectaculars with subtexts of anxiety and alienation. Mr. Burton, for his part, dwells most naturally (if somewhat uneasily) in the realms of the gothic and the grotesque, turning comic books and children¹s tales into scary, nightmarish shadow plays.

\

And so it should not be surprising that ³Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street,² Mr. Burton¹s film adaptation of Mr. Sondheim¹s musical, is as dark and terrifying as any motion picture in recent memory, not excluding the bloody installments in the ³Saw² franchise. Indeed, ³Sweeney² is as much a horror film as a musical: It is cruel in its effects and radical in its misanthropy, expressing a breathtakingly, rigorously pessimistic view of human nature. It is also something close to a masterpiece, a work of extreme ‹ I am tempted to say evil ‹ genius.

 

As it was originally performed onstage, with all the songs Mr. Sondheim composed for it, ³Sweeney Todd² balanced its inherent grisliness with a whimsical vitality. The basic story is a revenger¹s tragedy more Jacobean than Victorian, but Mr. Sondheim nonetheless wrings some grim, boisterous comedy out of both the impulse for vengeance and the bustling spirit of commerce. A barber, wronged by a powerful judge, returns to London and sets up shop, cutting throats as well as hair. The bodies of his victims are turned into savory meat pies by Mrs. Lovett, his energetic partner in business and crime. Cannibalism and mass murder as the basis for a hit show ‹ what a perverse and delicious joke.

 

It seemed a lot less funny in the recent revival, which starred Michael Cerveris and Patti Lupone in roles originated on Broadway by Len Cariou and Angela Lansbury in 1979. Mr. Burton¹s film, in spite of the participation of Sacha Baron Cohen (as a mountebank barber in a skin-tight costume) and Timothy Spall (as a louche bailiff) pretty much casts out frivolity altogether. Mr. Burton¹s London is a dark, smoky oil slick of a city. Dante Ferretti¹s production design, which owes something to the Victorian city confected for Carol Reed¹s ³Oliver!,² can make even daylight look sinister. Innocence, represented by a pair of young would-be lovers (Jayne Wisener and Jamie Campbell Bower) has virtually no chance in this place; it is a joke played by fate, something to be corrupted, imprisoned or destroyed.

 

Mrs. Lovett the pie maker is played by Helena Bonham Carter, a witchy fixture of Mr. Burton¹s cinematic universe as well as the mother of his children. If the director has an alter ego, or at least an actor consistently able to embody his ideas on screen, it would have to be Johnny Depp. He was the hurt, misunderstood man-child in ³Edward Scissorhands,² the cracked visionary in ³Ed Wood² and the cold, creepy candy mogul in ³Charlie and the Chocolate Factory,² in each case giving form to an emotional equation that had never quite been seen on film before. As Sweeney, his hair streaked with white and his eyes rimmed in black, he is an avatar of rage.

 

Mr. Depp¹s singing voice is harsh and thin, but amazingly forceful. He brings the unpolished urgency of rock ¹n¹ roll to an idiom accustomed to more refinement, and in doing so awakens the violence of Mr. Sondheim¹s lyrics and melodies. Some of the crowd-pleasing numbers, like ³The Ballad of Sweeney Todd,² have been pared away, but their absence only contributes to the diabolical coherence of the film, which moves with a furious momentum toward its sanguinary conclusion.

 

Like nearly every other horror-film serial killer ‹ the outcast teenager abused by the cool kids; the decent man whose suffering has been ignored or mocked ‹ Sweeney starts out as a sympathetic figure. Once upon a time, he was a happy husband and father, until his lovely wife (Laura Michelle Kelly) caught the eye of a malignant judge (Alan Rickman), who transported the poor barber to Australia. Now, after many years, he has returned to find that his daughter, now a teenager, has become the judge¹s ward. Finding his old straight razors ‹ ³my friends² ‹ under the floorboards of his former shop, Sweeney sets out to ensnare the judge, a project that requires the deaths of quite a few customers along the way.

 

³They¹ll never be missed,² sings the practical Mrs. Lovett. Sweeney¹s view is harsher, almost genocidal. ³They all deserve to die,² he says, looking out over the rooftops of the city. And Mr. Burton depicts those deaths ruthlessly. The initial geyser of blood may seem artificially bright, but when the bodies slide head first from the chair down a chute into the cellar, they crash and crumple with sickening literalness. You are watching human beings turned into meat.

 

It may seem strange that I am praising a work of such unremitting savagery. I confess that I¹m a little startled myself, but it¹s been a long time since a movie gave me nightmares. And the unsettling power of ³Sweeney Todd² comes above all from its bracing refusal of any sentimental consolation, from Mr. Burton¹s willingness to push the most dreadful implications of Mr. Sondheim¹s story to their blackest conclusions.

 

³Sweeney Todd² is a fable about a world from which the possibility of justice has vanished, replaced on one hand by vain and arbitrary power, on the other by a righteous fury that quickly spirals into madness. There may be a suggestion of hopefulness near the end, but you don¹t see hope on the screen. What you see is as dark as the grave. What you hear ‹ some of the finest stage music of the past 40 years ‹ is equally infernal, except that you might just as well call it heavenly.

 

Questions

 

  1. Define the underlined words (You may need to look some up)

 

 

 

  1. How is the movie different from the original stage performance?

 

 

  1. What is so unsettling about the movie?

 

 

  1. What does he like about the film?

 

 

 

  1. What is the world of the film like?

 

 

Essay Question.  Does this review make you want to see this film?

 

                                    -300 words

 

                                    -details